A PAIR OF GEORGE III JAPANNED & LACQUERED SIDE CABIENTS
Depth: 16”. 40 cm
Height: 33” 84 cm
Further images
Provenance
Private Colletion, London
Private Collection, New York
Literature
Jones, Yvonne. Japanned Papier-Mâché and Tinware c.1740–1940. Woodbridge: Antique Collectors’ Club, 2002.
Mengoni, Luisa E., and Francesca Leoni. Chinese Export Lacquer, 1550–1850. Oxford: Ashmolean Museum, 2010.
Murdoch, Tessa, and Michael Snodin. “The Painted Surface: Lacquer, Japanning and Vernis Martin.” In The Arts of France from François Ier to Napoléon Ier: A Centennial Celebration of Wildenstein’s Presence in New York, edited by James D. Draper et al., New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2005.
Watt, James C. Y., et al. East Asian Lacquer: The Florence and Herbert Irving Collection. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1991.
Forjaz, Jorge, and Maria Antónia Pinto de Matos. A Mirror of the Past: Chinese Export Lacquer Furniture in the Macao Museum Collection. Macao: Instituto Cultural de Macau, 2000.
A pair of richly adorned side cabinets with Chinese landscape scenes framed by scrolling foliage and trelliswork borders. The rectangular tops, above a pair of paneled doors opening to reveal two adjustable interior shelves, standing on brass paw feet.
These exceptional cabinets feature panels depicting idyllic lakeside pavilions and garden vignettes—scenes that echo the poetic landscapes of classical Chinese painting. The lacquer panels, brought from Canton (Guangzhou) by the East India Company in the 18th century, elevate the cabinets far beyond mere decorative furniture. They imbue the pieces with a tangible connection to global trade, cross-cultural exchange, and the early modern fascination with the East. The depth and luminosity of the lacquer, with its finely rendered motifs, contrasts beautifully with the surrounding japanned decoration, creating a richly layered surface—both visually and symbolically. In incorporating these authentic Chinese elements, the cabinets acquire not only exceptional material richness but also a distinct cultural cachet.
To understand the significance of such cabinets, one must consider the broader cultural climate of the early 19th century. Britain had been trading with China through the East India Company for over a century, and goods such as porcelain, lacquerware, silk, and tea had become fixtures in elite households. These imports were prized not only for their beauty but for the exotic allure they embodied—symbols of refinement, ancient civilisation, and the mysterious “other.” The term chinoiserie came to describe this aesthetic impulse: a European fantasy of China, loosely based on real motifs but filtered through romantic imagination.
The taste for chinoiserie was not merely decorative, however—it coincided with Enlightenment interest in non-European systems of thought. China, in particular, captured the philosophical imagination of figures like Voltaire, who admired Confucian ethics, and Adam Smith, who acknowledged the longevity of China’s imperial economy. Jesuit missionaries returning from the Qing court further fuelled this fascination by reporting on its order, ritual, and splendour. In the decorative arts, chinoiserie offered a means of engaging with these ideas while projecting wealth, cosmopolitanism, and cultivated taste.
By the turn of the 19th century, chinoiserie had returned to fashion, driven in no small part by the tastes of the Prince Regent. His redesign of the Brighton Pavilion into a fantasy of Eastern splendour sparked renewed enthusiasm for lacquerware, Chinese porcelain, and oriental motifs. In this context, these cabinets exemplify the refined eclecticism of the age—where neoclassical form met imported luxury and imaginative escapism.
Within this revivalist context, the present cabinets capture the hybrid aesthetic that defined the Regency period. Their structure is neoclassical—architectural, symmetrical, and practical—while their decoration conjures a dreamscape of distant landscapes and imagined encounters.
The juxtaposition of form and fantasy is precisely what made such objects desirable. These cabinets are cultural artefacts and powerful testimonies to a period when England looked eastward for artistic inspiration, even as it projected its own aesthetic values onto that vision.