WORKS FOR SALE
ENGLISH FURNITURE & ASIAN ART
A gilt bronze figure of Avalokiteshvara (Guanyin) 元末明初 珍稀銅鎏金四面觀世音菩薩坐像
China, Song to Yuan dynasty, 12th–14th century
Height: 61 cm 24”
Further images
Provenance
Acquired from a European Private Collection, circa 1980s
Exhibitions
Exhibition catalogue reference: China at the Inception of the Second Millennium: Art and Culture of the Sung Dynasty, 960–1279 - Cited for Song dynasty Ding wares with incised dragon comparanda (cat. nos. II-21 and III-17).
Exhibition reference “Chine: L’empire du trait. Calligraphies et dessins du Ve au XIXe siècle”, Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris, 2004, cat. no. 36a - Cited in connection with the Dunhuang bodhisattva head sketch and its tentative attribution by Nathalie Monnet.
Literature
Les arts de l’Asie centrale: La collection Paul Pelliot du musée national des arts asiatiques – Guimet - Cited for Dunhuang Guanyin paintings, with references to vol. I and vol. II plate ranges.
Wisdom Embodied: Chinese Buddhist and Daoist Sculpture in the Metropolitan Museum of Art - Cited for the related wooden bodhisattva figure (cat. no. A38), including its radiocarbon date range.
Zhongguo meishu quanji: Diaosu bian, 12: Sichuan shiku diaosu - Cited for comparison with Song dynasty cave sculpture at Anyue (pls. 128 and 130).
Chinese, Korean and Japanese Sculpture in the Avery Brundage Collection - Cited for the San Francisco comparable gilt bronze (pl. 159).
Qingbai Ware: Chinese Porcelain of the Song and Yuan Dynasties - Cited or comparanda of Guanyin figures in Qingbai, across multiple institutional collections.
A gilt-bronze figure of Avalokiteśvara (Guanyin)
China, Song to Yuan dynasty, 12th–14th century
An exceptionally rare and imposing gilt-bronze figure of Avalokiteśvara, seated in vajraparyaṅkāsana, the right hand lowered in varada mudrā and the left raised in abhaya mudrā. Each palm is incised with a half-closed eye, while a third eye appears upon the forehead.
The face is particularly remarkable. Beneath sharply arched brows, the eyes are gently lowered in meditation and the lips are softly modelled, creating an expression of profound calm and compassion. Although the facial type is essentially feminine, minute curls forming a moustache and beard deliberately introduce a masculine element. This striking androgyny reflects an early conception of Avalokiteśvara that predates the increasingly feminised representations of Guanyin familiar from later Chinese Buddhist art.
The hair is swept upwards into an elaborate jaṭāmukuṭa, embellished with miniature sacred figures and surrounded by an extraordinary arrangement of gilt ornaments and streaming ribbons terminating in stylised dragon heads. Long tresses descend towards the shoulders. The Bodhisattva is richly adorned with circular earrings, beaded necklaces, armlets, bracelets and anklets, while the body and garments are covered with exceptionally fine incised decoration.
A shawl, delicately engraved with scrolling lotus ornament, falls across the shoulders and descends over the arms. The lower garment is similarly enriched, with scrolling designs incorporating dragons, and is gathered at the waist beneath a beaded girdle. The quality of the engraved surface decoration is particularly noteworthy. Across the robes, jewellery and body ornaments, the bronze is treated almost as a piece of luxury metalwork, the finely incised patterns enlivening the broad gilded surfaces without compromising the monumentality of the figure.
Of particular significance are the dragons incorporated into the ornament of the robes. Their attenuated bodies, cloud-like heads and three-clawed feet find parallels in dragon decoration of the Song and Yuan periods. The combination of Buddhist imagery with such conspicuous dragon ornament is highly unusual and contributes substantially to the individuality of the sculpture.
The figure is hollow-cast, the underside remaining open.
Scientific dating
Thermoluminescence analysis undertaken by Oxford Authentication on material from the casting core produced a result consistent with a date in the 12th to 14th centuries. This provides important independent evidence for placing the casting within the Song to Yuan period and is particularly significant given the sculpture’s highly individual style.
The scientific result establishes a chronological framework in which the figure can be understood more convincingly. Rather than belonging to the highly codified tradition of Buddhist gilt-bronze sculpture associated with the early Ming court, particularly the Yongle period of 1403–1424, the present bronze appears to belong to an earlier and less standardised phase of production.
Large-scale Buddhist gilt-bronze sculpture had been produced in China well before the Ming dynasty, although early examples were generally smaller and more conservative in conception. From the Liao period onwards, Buddhist sculptures increasingly assumed a greater physical presence, and by the Song, Jin, Western Xia and Yuan periods a wide range of regional styles had developed. These traditions were shaped by successive courts, religious centres and workshop practices, and no single stylistic orthodoxy prevailed.
The present sculpture should be understood within this pluralistic environment. Its unusual facial type, complex iconography and archaic elements appear not as anomalies, but as evidence of the persistence and reinterpretation of earlier Buddhist visual traditions.
The androgynous image of Avalokiteśvara
The facial conception is among the most distinctive features of the bronze. Although the underlying structure is soft and feminine, the sculptor has deliberately introduced a slight moustache and beard. The result is neither conventionally masculine nor fully feminine.
This conception corresponds closely with earlier Chinese representations of Avalokiteśvara in which masculine and feminine attributes coexist. Such imagery is particularly evident in Buddhist painting from Dunhuang in Gansu province, where Avalokiteśvara was represented in wall paintings, banners and textiles from the late Tang through the Five Dynasties and into the Song period.
These works frequently display sharply arched eyebrows, full lips, elongated eyes, elaborate jewellery and streaming ribbons, together with a facial type that resists straightforward gender classification. The present bronze appears to preserve and reinterpret this older pictorial conception in three dimensions.
A particularly relevant comparison may be made with an ink drawing of the head of a Bodhisattva discovered at Dunhuang and now in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris. The drawing, generally associated with the late Tang or Five Dynasties period, displays closely related characteristics, including sharply arched brows, pronounced lips, horizontal folds at the neck and an elaborate arrangement of jewellery and ribbons.
The significance of this comparison is not that the bronze must date to the same period, but rather that the sculptor appears to have drawn upon a visual type with much earlier origins. Such persistence of archaic models is entirely plausible within the artistic environment of the Song and Yuan periods.
Sculptural comparisons
Further comparisons may be drawn with Buddhist sculpture of the late tenth through twelfth centuries. A standing wooden Bodhisattva in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, radiocarbon-dated to between 970 and 1120, displays related facial proportions, a similarly elongated bodily conception and comparable attention to the articulation of jewellery and drapery.
Related characteristics may also be observed in figures of Guanyin carved into the rock at the Huayan Caves in Anyue County, Sichuan province, attributed to the Northern Song dynasty. Although executed in a different medium and regional tradition, these sculptures similarly combine physical monumentality with highly ornamental surface treatment.
The closest known gilt-bronze comparison appears to be an Avalokiteśvara in the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco, formerly in the Avery Brundage Collection. Although less elaborately ornamented and lacking the extraordinary ribbons and dragon-headed flourishes of the present figure, it shares a closely related conception in its proportions, facial type and general sculptural vocabulary.
The rarity of such closely comparable examples suggests that the present bronze belongs to a relatively limited and highly individualised tradition rather than to the more standardised workshops responsible for later Ming Buddhist bronze production.
Yuan dynasty qingbai figures of Avalokiteśvara of comparable scale may at first appear related, particularly in their seated posture and richly adorned bodies. They are, however, generally softer in modelling and more overtly feminised in conception, distinguishing them from the present figure’s more assertive and consciously ambiguous character.
Ornament and the significance of the dragons
The incorporation of dragons into the robes deserves particular attention. Dragons are rarely deployed so prominently within the garments of a Bodhisattva, and their presence gives the sculpture an unusual visual and symbolic complexity.
The dragons are rendered with slender, twisting bodies, cloud-like heads and three-clawed feet, characteristics that find parallels in decorative arts of the Song and Yuan periods, particularly ceramics and metalwork. Their treatment supports the broad chronology indicated by thermoluminescence testing and reinforces the impression that the sculpture belongs to a period before the more formalised iconography of the early Ming.
The dragon-headed terminals of the billowing ornaments around the headdress further extend this vocabulary, surrounding the head with a dynamic arrangement of curling forms. These additions transform the normally static halo-like framework behind a Bodhisattva into something far more sculptural and animated.
Conclusion
Taken together, the thermoluminescence result, iconography, ornament and surviving comparisons support a 12th to 14th-century date for this remarkable sculpture.
Its imposing scale, exceptional quality of casting and gilding, extraordinarily refined engraved decoration, unusual androgynous conception of Avalokiteśvara and distinctive use of dragon ornament separate it from the more standardised Buddhist bronzes of the later Ming period.
The sculpture represents a rare survival from a complex period in the development of Chinese Buddhist art, when earlier visual traditions continued to be actively preserved and reinterpreted within new regional and artistic contexts. Its combination of monumentality, technical refinement and highly individual iconography makes it an exceptional example of Chinese Buddhist gilt-bronze sculpture of the Song to Yuan period.
TL tested: Oxford Authentication
Thermoluminescence testing of material from the casting core is consistent with a date in the 12th to 14th centuries.
Condition
Overall condition is very good. The small figure formerly mounted at the summit of the headdress is missing, but the sculpture is otherwise remarkably complete. There is minor wear to the gilding, particularly on the left arm, while the gilding overall remains in very good condition. The elaborate ribbons and other applied elements survive well. Traces of original black pigment remain visible in the hair. The underside is hollow.
ROLLESTON LTD
104A Kensington Church Street - London - W8 4BU
Telephone: + 44 (0) 207 229 5892
Email: advice@rollestonantiques.com
